Belur
Math and there will be no separate existence of the said Kathamrita
Trust. The trustees of the Belur Math will administer the properties ... Math hereby Kathamrita Bhavan Trust will stand extinguished and all
its assets and liabilities will stand vested with Ramakrishna Math. The
Kathamrita Bhavan will cease
wife Nagamma Math who is defendant No.1 of this case.
Subodh Math, Sunil Math and Mrs.Pavithra as his legal heirs.
Subodh Math died ... death of Nagaiah Sangaiah Math Sunil Math was in
absolute possession and enjoyment of the suit property as per the
Will dated
some properties to the Math. Therefore, the above said facts prove
that the Math was treated as a religious institution. Though the said Math ... temple was in
existence in the said property. There is no compound bifurcating the Temple
and Math. All the properties in the Math are dedicated
personal
property of defendant No.1, since the property under
the Will was always and will always be under the
ownership of the Math
owner of the
property-ABCD. When the plaintiff and defendants are claiming
that they have purchased property from Jagadguru Tontadarya
Saunsthana Math, in the said ... purchased the property
from Sri. Jagadguru Tontadarya Math, there is no recital that
there is a common passage and also in the Will under which
dated 14.08.1987 taking into consideration the
interest of the Maths and its properties, the
properties were taken over by the government until
Mathadhipathi was appointed ... more so, since the will has been disputed
and the claim made that the properties subject
matter of Naradgadde math comes within the
purview
Math is
absolutely false and hence denied. The so called Will is
absolutely document In fact Shree Samsthan is not the
property over which ... make any such a
proclamation, or execute any will with respect to the
succession of the properties belonging to Samsthan as
alleged in the plaint
will be made applicable to the Math in question. The
Mahant of the Math is / are appointed in terms of the condition
of a registered ... view of several
complaints filed against the petitioner for misuse of Math
property, the administrator of the Board vide Letter No. 2009
dated 29.12.2017, requested
appearing on behalf of the respondent Math, then
Sections 5 and 33 of the Temple Act, 1955 will be
rendered useless and nugatory and thereby ... respondent
Math in the light of the provisions of the Shri
Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 ?
2) Whether even otherwise, the Math had the right
swami owning properties or making
a will, and a sanyasi was capable in law of owning a property and bequeathing
the same. Reliance ... owning properties, then surely
there cannot be a bar to the said Swami making a Will. The
making or barring from making a Will
