NCLAT referred to the decision of this Court in the case of
Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software ... Tribunal referred to the enunciations of this Court in the case of
Mobilox Innovations and K. Kishan (supra) and held that it was a clear
NCLAT referred to the decision of this Court in the case of
Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software ... Tribunal referred to the enunciations of this Court in the case of
Mobilox Innovations and K. Kishan (supra) and held that it was a clear
Supreme Court of India, in a recent
case, in Mobilox Innovations Private Limited Vs.
Kirusa Software Private Limited2 , has categorically
laid down that ... Learned Adjudicating Authority had rightly relied on the ratio in
'Mobilox Innovations Private Limited' V/s. 'Kirusa Software Private
Limited
incomplete document.
4
18. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations
(supra) gave a very wide meaning to the term 'the existence ... Supreme Court in the matter of " Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. " reported in (2018) 1 SCC 353) and came
laid down
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd.' Vs.
'Kirusa Software ... ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Mobilox Innovations Pvt.
Ltd.' Vs. 'Kirusa Software
existing
dispute, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in Mobilox
Innovations (P) Ltd. v. Kirusa Software (P) Ltd. [Civil Appeal ... Appellant has referred to the following
judgments in support of his contentions-
Mobilox Innovations Private Limited. v. Kirusa
Software Private Limited
taking into consideration the decision
of Mobilox Innovations Private Limited Vs Kirusa
Software Private Limited . Thus, the
respondent having established a plausible contention
and which ... laid down in Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India in 'Mobilox Innovation Pvt. Ltd.' Vs. 'Kirusa
Software
genuine bills. Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kirusa Software Pvt.
Ltd. (2018) 1 SCC 353 held ... Supreme court in the case of Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd (Supra) has very
categorically held that the IBC is not intending to be a substitute
submissions, Mr. Dave
referred to the judgment of this Court in Mobilox Innovations
Private Limited v. Kirusa Software Private Limited1 ,
29. Mr. Dave drew ... this Court followed its earlier judgment in Mobilox Innovations
Private Ltd. (supra) and observed as hereunder:-
“In a recent judgment of this Court in Mobilox
case which operates in a regime different from the IBC;
(j) In Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd v. Kirusa Software Private Ltd17 this
Court observed ... SCCOnLine SC 707 (“Ebix Singapore”)
17
(2018) 1 SCC 353 (“Mobilox Innovations”)
11
PART C
7 The rival submissions fall for our consideration.
C Analysis
