seizin of the matter. The more guarded expression of opinion in Motion, In re, Mauley. Davis ... alone was competent to adjudicate upon the claims of third parties, Motion, In re, Maule v. Davis
2006-Court on its Own Motion Re: State Vs. Gurnek
Singh etc., the Court has answered four questions raised by a
lower court
2006-Court on its Own Motion Re: State Vs.
Gurnek Singh etc., the Court has answered four
questions raised by a lower court
2006-Court on its Own Motion Re: State Vs.
Gurnek Singh etc., the Court has answered four questions raised by a lower
court
others ) and Crl.Ref.1/2006 (Court on its Own Motion Re: State v. Gurnek Singh , etc.), the High Court of Delhi held that recourse
this view by a reference to Ellis v. Silber and in re motion : manic v. Davis (1872) L.R. 8 Ch. A. 8386 Taking
that the matter should be determined by a suit and not on motion in Insolvency. I do not agree with that view. I think that ... clearly stated in reference to cases of this kind in In re Motion Mark v. Davis (1874) 9 Ch. 192 thus:
If a Court
determination of the license the Administration may of their mere motion re-enter upon and re-take and absolutely retain possession of the said land
determination of the licence the Administration may of their mere motion re-enter upon and re-take and absolutely retain possession of the said land
Motion, In re, Maule v. Davis (1873) 9 Ch. 19(sic); 43 L.J. BK. 59 : 29 L.T. 757 : 32 W.R. 225. Taking
