Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 124 (1.10 seconds)

Ponnangan vs K.G.Nesan

Rule 17 can be exercised by the court either on its own motion or on an application filed by any of the parties ... There is no specific provision in the Code enabling the parties to re-open the evidence for the purpose of further examination-in-chief
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanniyathal vs Govindasamy : 1St

general rule merely on the ground that his recall and re- examination would not cause any prejudice to the parties. That is not the scheme ... exercised by the court either on its own motion or on an application filed by any of the parties to the suit, but as indicated
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document

M.Govindasamy vs Muthusamy

general rule merely on the ground that his recall and re- examination would not cause any prejudice to the parties. That is not the scheme ... exercised by the court either on its own motion or on an application filed by any of the parties to the suit, but as indicated
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next