Delhi High Court in SUMER SINGH SALKAN,
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION RE vs. ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR2 held that the petitioner can be permitted to move
Delhi High Court in SUMER SINGH SALKAN,
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION RE vs. ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR2 held that the petitioner can be permitted to move
Delhi High Court in SUMER SINGH SALKAN,
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION RE vs. ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR2 held that the petitioner can be permitted to move
that offence upon
administration of justice. In Court on its own motion In
Re State v. Sidharha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma, Delhi
High Court has observed
Section:01
In RE: THE MARRIAGE OF:
RAJESHKUMAR R. PATEL,
Former Husband,
and
ROSHANI R. PATEL,
Former Wife.
____________________/
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Rule
Emphasis provided)
35. The view stands re-iterated in Vitusah Oberoi
and others vs. Court on its own motion, (2017) 2 SCC 314
(Two Judges
Emphasis provided)
35. The view stands re-iterated in Vitusah Oberoi
and others vs. Court on its own motion, (2017) 2 SCC 314
(Two Judges
says that the Court shall summon and examine or
recall or re-examine any such person, if his evidence appears to it to be
essential ... opinion
that for the just decision of the case recall or re-examination of the
witness is necessary. Since the power is wide
corruption in respect
of public servants was required before setting in
29
motion investigative process, has held at para 34
as under ... said to be one o f taking
'cognizance' the reby re quiring the prio r
sanction in case o f a public servant
person in attendance though not summoned as a
witness or recall or re-examine any person already
examined, the relevant consideration while
exercising of that ... concept foreign to
criminal jurisprudence. Anyone can set the
criminal law in motion except where the statute
enacting or creating an offence indicates
