vote against the no-confidence motion which was
placed for discussion on 28.7.2011 and that the said motion was
moved without the knowledge or consent ... voted against the no-confidence motion
and thus committed defection. According to them, the no-
confidence motion was moved as per the decision
support the no-confidence motion scheduled to
be held on 24.10.2013. However, the petitioners voted against
the no-confidence motion moved on 24.10.2013 and thereby ... support the no-confidence motion scheduled to be held on
24.10.2013. But the petitioners voted against the no-confidence
motion moved on 24.10.2013 and thereby
members belonging to CPI (M). The
motion was thus adopted. Another motion was similarly moved against the
Vice President which was also adopted ... Panchayat held on 9.11.2009 to discuss the no confidence motion moved
against the President. It was passed with eight votes against four
were aware
of the party decision to defeat the no confidence motion
moved against the appellant. On this basis, it was found
that they have ... regarding the no confidence motion. In
fact, it was the members of KCM that the no confidence
motion was moved. It is, after an analysis
separate block had voted in favour of the no
confidence motion moved by the rival political parties
and thereafter those members had been removed from ... separate block; those members had in fact
supported the no confidence motion moved by the
rival political parties. Thus the inevitably inferential
conduct
proceedings issued by the
Returning Officer declaring the no confidence motion moved against
the Chairman of the Municipal Council, the appellant in Writ Appeal ... confidence motion only one person participated
i.e. the Chairman against whom no confidence motion was moved
M.V. Benny vs State Election Commission on 2 November, 2020
Author: Anil K.Narendran
procedure for moving a motion of no-
confidence, nor does it provide that the motion is
to be moved in any particular manner "prescribed ... convening of Special
General Body, for consideration of the no-
confidence motion moved against the Managing
Committee of the Society, fail.
22. As per interim
voted in favour of the motion. Ten
LDF members also voted in favour of the motion and the motion
stood passed.
3. It is alleged ... belong to rival political parties, and the motion was adopted.
Another motion was moved against the Vice-President, which
was also adopted. There was floor
members and
without their support the motion could not have been
carried. As the motion was moved in such political
equations, the inevitable inference ... members of UDF in a
no-confidence motion. The allegation was that the no-confidence
motion was moved in defiance of of the whip
