land held in Jagir, by Hindu Idol (deity) as
Dolidar or Muafidar cultivated by a person other than the
Shebait/Pujari of the deity ... land held in Jagir, by Hindu Idol
(deity) as Dolidar or Muafidar cultivated by a person other
than the Shebait/Pujari of the deity
This order pertains to the time when Nikoo Dass Sadhu Udasi was Muafidar and the succession was described as Pusht Dar Pusht Chela Hai, that ... land was held by Budh Dass Chela Nikoo Dass. Fakir Udasi Muafidar as owner. Muafi was being held by him in his personal capacity
rents but they were liable to pay the revenue to certain muafidars whose names are detailed below:
7. Dalpat Rai was entitled to half ... plaintiff is entitled to sue?
(4) Whether the plaintiff is a muafidar? and
(5) Whether the suit is barred
area 31.16 acres) situate at Pul Bogda, Bhopal, as a Muafidar in the erstwhile State of Bhopal. The petitioner was a sub-tenant (a Shikmi ... Board of Revenue held that the respondent No. 5, being a Muafidar, could not be regarded as an 'occupant' within the meaning
Land Revenue Act, 1932, S. 2(15),
"occupant", Whether includes Muafidars Iandlords.
Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code ... effect on Shikmis.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant was a Muafidar of the disputed land, in
the erstwhile Bhopal State, while the first respondent
cultivated the said
sustainable.
2. Maulana Shamsuddin, the sole appellant in this appeal, was a Muafidar in the erstwhile State of Bhopal of the disputed lands in accordance ... person in whose favour such relinquishment is made is called "Muafidar";". Sub-section (15) provides :-
"Occupant" means a person
number of persons who claimed to hold the same as muafidars under a grant anterior to the establishment of British Rule in the district ... that when the muafi was thus resumed it was settled with the muafidars. This is certainly not an admitted fact, in the present case
sale and for possession of the grove by the ejectment of the muafidars and their transferees.
3. The plaintiff relied in support of the custom ... specific purposes", it was stated that so long as the muafidar or his descendants remained in possession, there will be no interference with them
sale and for possession of the grove by the ejectment of the muafidars and their transferees.
2. The plaintiff relied in support of the custom ... specific purposes," it was stated that so long as the muafidar or his descendants remained in possession, there will be no interference with them
possession over certain cultivatory plots. The plaintiff claimed that he was the muafidar and that the defendants were trespassers who had taken possession ... would not apply since the plaintiff's claim as a muafidar was not covered by Section 180. It is pointed out that Section
