does not have a sound case for considering 0.25% as commission,
as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other hand ... above this has been held to be reasonable in the following cases:
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann.com 144 (Hyd-Trib)
(ii) Aurobindo Pharma
does not have a sound case for considering 0.25% as commission,
as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other hand ... above this has been held to be reasonable in the following cases:
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann.com 144 (Hyd-Trib)
(ii) Aurobindo Pharma
case for considering 0.25% as commission,
as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other hand, a
review of cases ... above this has been held to be reasonable in the following cases:
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann.com 144 (Hyd-Trib)
(ii) Aurobindo Pharma
case for considering 0.25% as commission,
as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other hand, a
review of cases ... above this has been held to be reasonable in the following cases:
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann.com 144 (Hyd-Trib)
(ii) Aurobindo Pharma
asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other hand, a review
of cases on this subject, reveals that a CG commission ... above
this has been held to be reasonable in the following cases:
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann.com 144 (Hyd-Trib)
(ii) Aurobindo Pharma
case for considering
0.25% as commission, as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other
hand, a review of cases ... following cases:
9
ITA Nos. 150 & 151/Kol/2024
S K Sarawagi and Company Private Limited
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann
case for considering
0.25% as commission, as asked for based on the Everest Kanto case (supra). On the other
hand, a review of cases ... following cases:
9
ITA Nos. 150 & 151/Kol/2024
S K Sarawagi and Company Private Limited
(i) NCC Ltd 157 taxmann
provision
of section 40(a)(1) is not applicable in this instant case" .
3. The Assessing Officer did not find the explanation offered ... assessee-company to M/s. NCC Limited and even
though it was adjusted by NCC Limited against the amount payable to the
assessee-company, such
supra) did not consider the Co-ordinate Bench
decision as the case of CIT vs. Aimil Ltd. (supra) it cannot be a stare-decise ... decisions of the High Court
of equal strength [(DB) in this case], it cannot be said that later judgment need to be
followed, unless
supra) did not consider the
Co-ordinate Bench decision as the case of CIT vs. Aimil Ltd. (supra) it cannot be a stare-decise ... decisions of the High
Court of equal strength [(DB) in this case], it cannot be said that later judgment need to be followed,
unless
