that he is doing the work of teaching children. He also solemnize
Nikah. He deposed that the Nikahnama Ex. PW1/DX2 was executed ... admitted that he had performed the Nikah of Accused Yesdam
and girl namely Iram Khan. DW1 correctly identified Accused Yesdam
Shaikh when produced in court
marry each
other. They wanted to marry crossing this hurdle, hence firstly nikah was
performed on 11.02.2005 and thereafter notice for intended marriage
under ... Thus, with nikahnama dated
11.02.2005 available on record and she having performed nikah with the
Respondent after attaining the age of puberty, if entering into
present in the house of her uncle to take
part in the nikah ceremony. The accuse had told her that they will
also solemnise marriage ... accused were present in her
house, getting ready for Nikah ceremony, accused offered to her
coffee which had been prepared by him, after consuming which
prosecutrix and on 18.02.2011 in the presence of few people, the
Nikah of Nurul Islam and the prosecutrix was performed, but since the
said date ... request of her
parents the parents of the accused agreed for their Nikah and solemnized
their Nikah on 18.02.2011 or that she was not taken
disclose all these facts to anyone. On
08.05.2013, accused no. 1 solemnized Nikah with her and
thereafter made physical relations with her 2-3 times ... cross
examination conducted by Ld. Defence Counsel, she
admitted that she solemnized Nikah with accused no. 1 on
06.05.2013 at ___z-4muddin and Nikahnama
accused where
she was kept; she denied that any marriage/'nikah' was performed. She
however admitted that she had made her statements both ... deposing falsely for any
purpose; the Qazi who had performed the 'nikah' had also been
examined as PW-12. This document thus shows
petitioner. It has been contended that petitioner has performed marriage
(nikah) with the prosecutrix on 20.04.2014 and they have been residing
together in protection home ... wherein she had clearly stated as regards having performed nikah
with the present petitioner-Kallu on 20.04.2014 and thereafter having stayed
Kanchan
lawfully wedded as husband and wife and they
have performed Nikah according to their customs. The
respondent No.2, Sehnazben D/o. Gafarbhai Haji
Ismailbhai
according to rites and rituals and customs of the community, the Nikah
of prosecutrix was performed with the applicant and thereafter they
have resided together
subsequent continuation of the same but on the
pretext of affirming Nikah but ultimately refused and the complainant-
informant, who disclosed the miseries faced
