Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2280 (0.96 seconds)

Govindraju R G vs Home Affairs on 20 October, 2023

applicant has further argued that the competent authority for grant of NOC for deputation, extension of deputation and or for absorption of the applicant under ... that the respondents no.1 & 2 have accorded and issued NOC for deputation/absorption under different organizations in favour of those similarly persons. Moreover
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs Csir Hqrs, New Delhi on 12 February, 2026

Neha Dhiman, Study Leave, Shri Kanwar, Deputation, Shri Satish - Deputation, Shri P.S. Prasad- Deputation, Shri Gajendra Kumar, Deputation. 6. The Respondent, while defending ... Neha Dhiman, Study Leave, Shri Kanwar, Deputation, Shri Satish - Deputation, Shri P.S. Prasad- Deputation, Shri Gajendra Kumar, Deputation. Accordingly, the PIO is directed
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Govindraju R G vs Home Affairs on 6 March, 2023

NOC was considered by the Respondent No.1, i.e. Ministry of Home Affairs, the respondent no.1 granted NOC for extension of deputation ... NOC for permanent absorption of the applicant before issuance of the impugned order dated 13.1.2023 refusing to issue NOC for 6th year extension of deputation
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somesh Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 28 April, 2016

letter dated 20.02.2015 at Annexure A-12 seeking further consent/NOC for extension of deputation period of the applicant for another six months ... absence of any consent/NOC for extension of his deputation period by the last six months' period of the 5th year of his deputation
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next