basis of which the Commission issued a notice of enquiry (NOE) against the respondents charging them with having indulged in certain restrictive trade practices. Respondent ... supplied to the respondents in the form of an annexure to the NOE. At the request of the respondents, they were provided with copies
case having been made out, the Commission issued a Notice of Enquiry (NOE) to the respondents under Section 10(a)(iv) read with Section ... referred to as the MRTP Act, hereafter).
2. In the NOE, it has been alleged that respondent No. 1, in association with respondent
basis of the application of the DG, a notice of enquiry (NOE) was issued on 6th June, 1988, summarising the charges and calling upon ... detailed reply was filed by the respondent to the NOE. The respondent has taken certain preliminary objections while making its defence on the merits
Commission on December 9, 1997, and for discharging the notice of enquiry (NOE) issued, inter alia, against respondent No. 2. The Director-General has filed ... respondent No. 1. By its order passed on December 9, 1997, an NOE was ordered to be issued making it returnable on February
filed by the DG, the Commission issued a Notice of Enquiry (NOE) dated 5.2.1996 to the respondent under Section 10(a)(iv) read with Sections ... MRTP Act" hereafter).
2. In its reply to NOE the respondent has denied the allegations of restrictive trade practices and has explained the facts
case for issuance of a Notice of Enquiry (NOE).
4. A prima facie case having been made out against the respondent, a 'NOE ... issued to the respondent on 7.6.1991. In the NOE, it has been inter alia stated that the two boilers supplied by the respondent suffered from
charge of unfair trade practices. In particular, the notice of enquiry (NOE) charges the respondents with having offered prizes free of charge whereas the cost ... thus, creating an impression contrary to facts. Furthermore, the NOE charges the respondents'with offering prizes or gifts depending upon chance. While specifying that
respondents during the course of the proceedings. Finally, the Notice of Enquiry (NOE) was issued to M/s. Angira Heavy Engineering Industries, under Sections ... MRTP Act.
4. The respondent filed a reply to the NOE in which, it has been clarified that the respondent had supplied two cutting machines
respondents during the course of the proceedings. Finally, the Notice of Enquiry (NOE) was issued to M/s. Angira Heavy Engineering Industries, under Sections ... MRTP Act.
4. The respondent filed a reply to the NOE in which, it has been clarified that the respondent had supplied two cutting machines
having made out a prima facie case, a Notice of Enquiry (NOE in short) was issued to the respondent. Despite adequate opportunities given, the respondent ... neither filed a reply to the NOE nor entered appearance in the Court. Consequently proceedings were set ex-parte against the respondent vide Commission
