some quite
obvious infirmities. Each of the four injured eye witnesses,
while naming each of the eighteen accused persons as
participants in the occurrence ... From the manner in which each
witness could, without making any mistake, name each of the
eighteen accused persons, almost in the same order
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
learned trial Judge has opined that Sadhu Singh might have per mistake named Phoola Ram instead of Ganesh Singh being admitted in the hospital
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
detenu, names of 11 persons, including the dummies and the detenu have been mentioned.
Since in our view, the name of the detenu figures both ... Hindi translation of the F.I.R. there are three mistakes namely:-
(a) in place
name of accused as Sanjay @ Golu volunteered
the name of accused is Golu @ Pankaj s/o Ashok Rao, but due to
typographical mistake name ... remove
typographical mistake. He further deposed that he had not filed any
report on record which can prove that the name of accused is Golu
