necessary to
convene Review DPCs to rectify certain unintentional mistakes, namely, -
W.P.(C) 12875/2021 Page 7 of 22
Signature Not Verified
DigitallySigned ... omitted to be considered;
or
(b) where ineligible persons were considered by mistake;
or
(c) where the seniority of a person is revised with
retrospective
officer vested
with jurisdiction to correct the mistake, he will correct the
WP(C): 25270/2019 -:12:-
mistake and he may be given two weeks ... still the officer competent and
empowered to correct the mistake namely Tahsildar (LR).
Varkala who gave evidence as RW3 in, asserting that the
property
belonged to the family of
the plaintiffs, yet on account of mistake, name of ancestor of the defendants
had been entered into the revenue record ... while entering
the name of the owner in the revenue record, more particularly on account
of similarly sounding names, the name of ancestor
Register by
deleting Yash Vardhan Mall's name was carried down to rectify
the said mistake. The Learned Senior Counsel for Respondents
has referred ... Yash Vardhan Mall's name is by a valid transfer of
4160 shares and no mistake in the said transfer is apparent
exercising power of rectification of mistake, it is a condition
precedent that the mistake must be glaring and obvious. If the question is
debatable, then ... term which fell for consideration was the same, namely,
'mistake apparent from the record'.
10. It is worthwhile repeating that
with that of Anvarbhai Manjothi in the Police complaint because by mistake, the name of driver had wrongly been mentioned. Consequently, the main contention ... proper condition after the accident, and had by mistake mentioned the name of Hatuba Kalaji Sodha, who was her co-passenger, as driver
protesters. This witness/ASI Surender further stated
that due to clerical mistake name of two accused namely Chand
Mohammad Mukhtyar and Firoz, were wrongly typed ... persons as accused persons, who
were not named in that statement. The realization of any
typographical mistake, as shown to be made
typographical error.
Further, it seems that due to typographical mistake, name
of the respondent no. 2Sh. Surender Singh and respondent no. 3
SBI General
this present case but it seems that due to
typographical mistake, name of only respondent no. 1/driver has
been mentioned while framing issues. Further ... Geeta Devi & Ors. Vs. Omkaar @ Omkaar Singh & Ors. 7
typographical mistakes. Hence, issue no. 1 is reframed as under:
Whether Mahendra
voting rights,
as the case may be.
Page 5 of 31
intentional mistake. The Appellant claims that it got to know about
the said acquisition ... required under the law has been done yet by some
mistake the name is either omitted or wrongly recorded
in the Register of the company
