Md. Alam Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 4664 (1.79 seconds)Hafsa Rahman T. Aged 39 Years vs State Of Kerala on 3 September, 2015
wife's name is Madhavi and he did not marry a lady by name Malathi.
It was this mistake that was sought ... investigation, enquiry or trial we find wrong names being deleted and correct names
included or substituted and mistakes corrected. That is something necessary
Rajo Mahto & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
Anandi Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
Kamo Mahto & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
Domi Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
Bimal Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2018
involved in the occurrence. He stated that due to
mistake name of Yukti Lal was incorrectly disclosed as
Mukti Lal. This witness has further stated
In Re: Arumugha Solagan vs Unknown on 26 January, 1931
Tanjore and West Tanjore,. Perhaps if any mistake was ever committed it must have been a verbal mistake, that is, the officers who have been ... officer was the District Magistrate for both. Beyond this possible verbal mistake, namely, that the District Magistrate of East Tanjore District and of West Tanjore
Dana Yadav @ Dahu & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2002
knew the appellant
by sight. Though he made a mistake about his name by referring to him as
Kailash Chandra, it was within the knowledge ... that the absence of the identification
parade or a mistake made as to his name, would be necessarily fatal to the
prosecution case
Munshi Singh Gautam (D) & Ors vs State Of M.P on 16 November, 2004
knew
the appellant by sight. Though he made a mistake
about his name by referring to him as Kailash
Chandra, it was within the knowledge ... that the absence of the identification
parade or a mistake made as to his name, would be
necessarily fatal to the prosecution case