statement claims the land to have
vested in it under the Nazul Agreement of 1937 between the Secretary of
State for India in Council ... denial that the suit property is not part of Nazul Land under the
Nazul Agreement of 1937.
90. Similarly, the plaintiffs have filed certified copies
government land and transferred to DDA by virtue of Nazul
Agreement, 1983. It is further submitted that as per payment
and collection Ledgers (Damages) available ... government property and transferred to DDA by virtue of Nazul
Agreement, 1937. That the plaintiffs or his predecessors were
never the owner of this land
under the control and
management of Delhi Improvement Trust vide Nazul Agreement of 1937.
Thereafter, it is shown in the name of DDA in accordance ... placed under the control and management of DDA in
terms of Nazul Agreement of 1937. It is therefore asserted, that the suit is
liable
Court has failed to
appreciate. It is further pleaded that the nazul agreement Ex.DW3/1
does not mention as to which land ... claiming its right over the
property in question?
Ans: Nazul Agreement dated
31.03.1937 which is Ex.DW1/PX.
Q2: Whether in the agreement
Jamabandi for the year 191819; Ex. DW1/1, Nazul
Agreement executed between the government and Delhi Improvement
trust; Ex. DW1/2, Attested ... which was placed at the
disposal of DDA by virtue of Nazul Agreement of 1937. It was claimed
Suit No. 428/14 Attaur Rehman
government land and transferred to
DDA by virtue of nazul agreement, 1937. It is stated that Sh. Gyani Ram
Singh was in unauthorised occupation ... suit property was transferred to DDA by nazul
agreement. She admitted that the suit property was being used for
commercial purposes. She admitted that
Government of India and which, by virtue of the Nazul agreement
of 1937 stands under the Management and Control of
Defendant/DDA. It is claimed ... government and
control & management of DDA by virtue of Nazul Agreement of
1937 ?
3. Whether the suit is bad for want of notice
government land and transferred to
DDA by virtue of nazul agreement, 1937. It is stated that Sh. Gyani Ram
Singh was in unauthorised occupation ... suit property was transferred to DDA by nazul
agreement. She admitted that the suit property was being used for
commercial purposes. She admitted that
examined two
witnesses to prove his case and relied upon Nazul Agreement as Ex. D1W1/1; show cause notice
dated ... cross-
examination, he stated that it is correct that Nazul Agreement does not mention khasra number
however, he has instantly cleared by voluntarily mentioning that
government land
transferred to DDA by virtue of Nazul Agreement 1937. It is stated that
at present the suit property is lying vacant and plaintiff ... mauja Inder pal transferred to DDA by
cirtue of Nazul Agreement, 1937? OPD
7. Relief.
6. Plaintiff has examined himself as the only witnesses
