expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
expression 'subject matter of the arbitration' is not to be
confused with the expression 'subject matter of the suit'. The
expression ... Court. This is the
expression that the Supreme Court itself used when it said that the
expression refers to a Court that would essentially
Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Ramjiban Serowgee to support his contention that definitions given in one Statute cannot be used to interpret the same expression occurring ... word or an expression in a particular Act or Statute cannot be utilized for the interpretation of a similar word or expression occurring