Nippon Express (India) Pvt. Ltd vs Acc, Mumbai on 20 January, 2016
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH ... Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
:
Yes
Nippon Express (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Vs
Commissioner of Customs (Imports)
ACC, Mumbai
Respondent
Service Tax - Chennai vs Nippon Express India Pvt Ltd on 7 February, 2019
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH ... Service Tax,
Chennai).
CCE & ST, Chennai : Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Nippon Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. : Respondent
ST/146,268/2011
(Arising out of Order
Nippon Express( India) Pvt. Ltd. vs The Principal Commissioner Customs ... on 21 August, 2025
C/20316/2022
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE ... passed by the Commissioner of the Customs (Appeals), Bangalore.)
M/s. Nippon Express (India) Private
Limited
"The Icon", No.8, 4th Floor, Appellant
Nippon Express India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Gst&Amp;Cce (Chennai ... on 1 May, 2019
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
CHENNAI ... passed by
Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai)
M/s.Nippon Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
B-1, 3rd & 4th Floors,
Thiru-vi-ka-Industrial
Nippon Express India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Gst&Amp;Cce (Chennai ... on 1 May, 2019
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
CHENNAI ... passed by
Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai)
M/s.Nippon Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
B-1, 3rd & 4th Floors,
Thiru-vi-ka-Industrial
Court of Madras in M/s. India
Nippon Electricals Ltd v CESTAT to canvass that the views expressed
by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal
expressions enabling authorities to remit duty on such goods. I
find that the Tribunal in the case of Hind Nippon Rural Industries
(P) Ltd. case
Jindal Steel & Power Limited vs Bhubaneswar(Preventive) on 30 January, 2024
IN THE CUSTOMS
Company and others 13 and on State of Gujarat vs. Arcelor Mittal
Nippon Steel India 14 to contend that grant of benefit of concessional
rate ... others
department would be justified in its belief only if the expressions
"exclusively" or "solely" or "only" are added
Company and others 13 and on State of Gujarat vs. Arcelor Mittal
Nippon Steel India 14 to contend that grant of benefit of concessional
rate ... others
department would be justified in its belief only if the expressions
"exclusively" or "solely" or "only" are added
