Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 545 (1.60 seconds)

P.R. Anandvally Amma vs Union Of India on 14 October, 2013

4600/- was not in accordance with OM dated 24.11.2008 and OM dated 13.11.2009, it was cancelled vide order dated 21.07.2012. The applicant was granted first ... vide OM dated 24.11.2008 with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the VI Pay Revision. In view of that, the OM dated 13.11.2009 is not applicable
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

K P Rajagopal vs M/O Finance on 1 June, 2016

OM dated 13.11.2009 (reproduced by us above). 45. As is clear from the contents of Annexure A-2 dated 13.11.2009, already reproduced by us, Para ... Note dated 14.12.2009 only clarifies that the Clarification issued through the OM dated 13.11.2009 already covers the Assistants under CSS and PAs under CSSS
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramniwas Meena vs Cgda on 26 August, 2025

respondents herein would be covered by the OM dated 24.11.2008 and accordingly the OM dated 13.11.2009 would not be applicable to them. As recorded above ... present case. The OM dated 24.11.2008 had already given the benefit mentioned and accorded by the OM dated 13.11.2009. 19. As far as paras
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D Selvaraj vs M/O Railways on 22 January, 2019

4600/- was not in accordance with OM dated 24.11.2008 and OM dated 13.11.2009, it was cancelled vide order dated 21.07.2012. The applicant was granted first ... vide OM dated 24.11.2008 with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the VI Pay Revision. In view of that, the OM dated 13.11.2009 is not applicable
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhamidipati Naresh vs M/O Statistics on 22 January, 2019

4600/- was not in accordance with OM dated 24.11.2008 and OM dated 13.11.2009, it was cancelled vide order dated 21.07.2012. The applicant was granted first ... vide OM dated 24.11.2008 with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the VI Pay Revision. In view of that, the OM dated 13.11.2009 is not applicable
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Intikhab Jafar vs M/O Statistics on 22 January, 2019

4600/- was not in accordance with OM dated 24.11.2008 and OM dated 13.11.2009, it was cancelled vide order dated 21.07.2012. The applicant was granted first ... vide OM dated 24.11.2008 with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the VI Pay Revision. In view of that, the OM dated 13.11.2009 is not applicable
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Jha vs M/O Defence on 25 April, 2024

Accounts (Fys), Kolkata vide letter dated 08.07.2022 clarified the following :- "......................................... (i) .......................as per MoF OM dated 13.11.2009 the posts which were ... under CBEC as per Department of Expenditure's OM dated 24.11.2008 (read with OM dated 27.11.2008), the post of Junior Hindi Translator
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next