Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 147 (0.88 seconds)

R Hanumantha Naidu vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P Bhaskara Rao vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J S Subrahmanyam vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Samuel vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P Ujjinaiah vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Venkataiah vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T C Reddeppa vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Viswanatha Reddy vs Dept Of Posts on 17 July, 2020

Besides, they relied on Rule 151 of Civil Service Regulations and OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept of Expenditure to fortify their submissions. Drawal of increment ... another increment from 1.7.2006, as per 6th CPC recommendations communicated vide OM dated 19.3.2012 of Dept. of Expenditure and as per Rule
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next