Badhra and obtained
his signatures on 3-4 papers and also took OTP number as come on his
mobile phone No.xxxx8531. Few days ... photos and got his
signatures on some documents and noted the OTP came on his mobile
phone. A3er some more days, Ashin telephonically called
that whenever the
challan fees are to be deposited, an OTP (one- me password) would be automa cally
generated at the me of deposit ... such, OTP was generated with one Sonia.
Similarly, regarding the deposit of driving fees, OTP was generated with Transport
Inspector Ravinder, and the pe oner
Badhra and obtained his signatures on 3-4 papers and also took OTP
number from his mobile phone No.xxxx8531. Few days thereafter, Ashin ... photos and got his signatures on some
documents and noted the OTP from his mobile phone. After some more
days, Ashin elephonically called
Badhra and obtained his signatures on 3-4 papers and also took
OTP number as come on his mobile phone No.xxxx8531. Few days ... photos and got
his signatures on some documents and noted the OTP from his mobile
phone. A5er some more days, Ashin telephonically called
Badhra and obtained his signatures on 3-4 papers and also took
OTP number from his mobile phone No.xxxx8531. Few days therea3er,
Ashin ... photos and got his
signatures on some documents and noted the OTP from his mobile phone.
A3er some more days, Ashin telephonically called
recovered Rs.20,000/- cash who received as commission on
pretext of OTP.
4. That, during the course of inves ga on Anil Manjhi ... mobile to co-accused, on which
co-accused Farhan Ansari took the OTP of the mobile which was
used by the present pe oner. Copy
marke ng companies by using mobiles and landlines, fraudulent authoriza on of OTP
through voice using VPN, etc., and submit a report containing steps ... recovered Rs.20,000/- cash who
received as commission on pretext of OTP. True translated copy
of disclosure statement of present pe oner is annexed
petitioner's name. The petitioner asserts that he received the OTP on his mobile phone.
However, the petitioner denies any involvement and asserts that ... petitioner was there in the customer application which
would show that OTP was going to him, however petitioner's counsel submits that he
never
various numbers to the complainant, befooled him to share one-time
passwords (OTPs) received by him, and subsequently withdrew Rs. 9,87,000/-
from
introduced to the case. The accused
Vishal, upon receipt of OTP on Bhupender's phone had deleted the
messages and accordingly the offence punishable
