application on behalf of Sri V. S. Sundaram, District Magistrate, Manipur and Sri T.C. Tiankham, Superintendent Imphal Jail, for obtaining leave for filing ... Regarding the contention that the Manipur State Government was a necessary party to the contempt proceedings, I think, the Manipur State Government did not actually
correct."
7. Reliance was placed on Nabachandra v. Manipur Administration A.I.R. 1964 Manipur 39, wherein it is held that twenty-four hours ... prescribed under Section 61 of the Cr.P.C. is the outer most limit beyond which a per ion cannot be detained in police custody
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
Author: A.M. Khanwilkar
Iqbal Kaur Kwatra vs The Director General Of Police, ... on 2 April, 1996
Equivalent citations
Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, Through ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 5 May, 2017
Author: A
Architectural Style Of A North Indian ... vs ?Kfm+;Ky] 'Ka[K Dh /Ofu;Kwa
State vs Prakash Ch. De And Anr. on 13 September, 1976
Equivalent citations: 1977CRILJ863
JUDGMENT
Mst X (Through Mother And Natural ... vs State And Ors on 13 May, 2021
Author
The State Of Manipur Represented By The ... vs Lh Wolring on 25 March, 2021
Equivalent
Shri Dwik Lyngdoh & Ors vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 30 September, 2011