Maharashtra Power Development Corpn. ... vs Dabhol Power Company on 31 March, 2004
facto or de jure. It is not essential that the alleged oppressor is oppressing in order to obtain a financial benefit; conduct maybe oppressive under
Search Results Page
Search Results
41 - 50 of 238 (0.56 seconds)Action Committee vs Union Of India on 18 July, 1994
another in search of livelihood or
to escape the wrath of their oppressors. Earlier they did
not experience any difficulty in obtaining caste/tribe
certificates
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 December, 2011
Collector, Jabalpur and the other Government functionaries whom
he perceived as his oppressors and perpetrators of the alleged offences
against him must be sent behind
N.K. Mohapatra vs State Of Orissa And Ors. on 3 May, 1994
result of some overbearing act or attitude on the part of oppressor. (See In re Jernyn Street Curkish Baths
S.H. Jhabwala And Ors. vs Emperor on 3 August, 1933
S.H. Jhabwala And Ors. vs Emperor on 3 August, 1933
Equivalent citations: AIR1933ALL690, 145IND
Yashovardhan Saboo vs Groz-Beckert Saboo Ltd. And Ors. on 22 October, 1992
Yashovardhan Saboo vs Groz-Beckert Saboo Ltd. And Ors. on 22 October, 1992
Equivalent citations
S. P. Gupta vs M/S. Packwell Manufacturers (Delhi) ... on 26 August, 2013
permissible to dissect the conduct of the
alleged oppressor into separate acts of oppression or mis-management.
In Shanti Prasad Jain vs. Kalinga Tubes
Binod Kumar Agarwal And Ors. vs Ringtong Tea Company Private Ltd. And ... on 26 July, 1993
Binod Kumar Agarwal And Ors. vs Ringtong Tea Company Private Ltd. And ... on 26 July
Nafan B.V vs Saf Yeast Company Pvt.Ltd. And 7 Ors on 29 October, 2015
Nafan B.V vs Saf Yeast Company Pvt.Ltd. And 7 Ors on 29 October
Enercon Gmbh vs Enercon (India) Ltd on 20 August, 2015
disclose any cause of action. It is the Mehras who
are the oppressors and mismanaged EIL.
(ii) Issues raised by Mehras in the petition