Group-D but his
candidature was rejected on the ground of overaged without giving age
relaxation to the extent of the casual work ... application of the applicant was rejected on
the ground of he being overaged, even by allowing age relaxation of
three years of his casual engagement
appeal was rejected on the
ground that the applicant is overaged vide letter dated 07.03.2014 (A/5).
The applicant challenged the said order of rejection ... delay in giving appointment is not
attributable to the applicant and, therefore, overaged ought not to have
stood on the way for getting appointment
casual
basis under the respondents for last two decades and have
become overaged. Therefore, throwing them out of
employment without regularization will have cascading
effect ... applicants as they having been continuing
since last two decades and became overaged. In view of
the chain of facts discussed above, this Tribunal
period of 27 years since
30.11.1998 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to
seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents
did not dispute
period of 25 years since
01.11.2001 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to
seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents
did not dispute
period of 27 years since
01.10.1998 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to
seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents
did not dispute
period of 28 years since
01.04.1998 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to
seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents
did not dispute
period of 25 years since
09.10.2001 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to
seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents
did not dispute
over a period of 24 years, and in the
meantime became overaged to seek for any employment in
government. Also, the respondents did not dispute
than two decades i.e. since 05.09.2000 till date and
meanwhile became overaged to seek any employment in
Government for sustenance of livelihood. Also
