Mandeep Kaur CWP 3704 Master
No.5400 of Cadre (Overage
2021 Matter)
2. LPA 1249 2023 Rupinderpal CWP No. 2392 Master
Kaur ... Cadre (Overage
Matter)
3. LPA 1234 2023 Inderjeet Kaur CWP No. 4161 Master
23838 of Cadre (Overage
2022 Matter)
4. LPA 1233 2023 Sukhpal Singh
rejected her
claim while raising altogether a new plea that she is overage for the post in
question and further alleged that petitioner has failed ... GMCH; but she is ineligible for the post in question being overage.
(4.2) Further submits that as per Advertisement No.3/2018, a candidate
affected adversely and moreover, as on
date, the petitioner has become overage to apply for any other government job and
till date he has completed ... years
now and most of them, if not all, may have become overage for fresh
recruitment within the State or outside the State. They have
application, it was found that as
on 01.01.1999, the petitioner was overage i.e. 47 years and 2 months old
hence, the petitioner ... ineligible so as to be
selected for the post in question being overage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
was allowed
omissions of the respondents. He fairly concedes that at present he is overage
and cannot be considered for the post.
3. The petitioner, faced with ... situation that he cannot be
permitted to work because he is already overage, submits that some amount of
1 of 2
::: Downloaded
prescribe
prescribed age relaxation to the
candidates who have become overaged
overage due to posts of Primary Teacherss
(PRTs) having not being advertised since ... first time after ten years.. In the
meanwhile, the petitioners have become overaged without getting any
opportunity to apply for the posts. In similar circumstances
remaining are not regularized due to lack of sanctioned posts or being
overage. The relevant extracts of the affidavit read as:
"3. That ... daily
wage work and 17 were not found eligible due to being overage
or due to not fulfilling the conditions of the policies issued
petitioner was ignored for promotion only on the ground
that he was overage as he had crossed the age of 35 years on
30.06.1992. Thereafter ... petitioner was ignored for promotion on the ground that he was
overage. During the pendency of the present petition, he has been
promoted vide order
permanently
rendered disqualified for further selection on account of being
overage for any subsequent selection. Therefore, the
cancellation has severely prejudiced the Petitioner. This
normal course have been promoted to
higher cadre. They are now overaged for entry into any
other service. It seems that most of them cannot
