Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 427 (1.25 seconds)

Promila Sejwal vs Govt. Of Nctd on 30 March, 2016

respect of first eight applicants (applicant Nos. 1 to 8), who were overage at the time of filing of applications for the examination for recruitment ... applicant Nos. 9 to 18) are different. Since they were not so overage as on the closing date for the receipt of the applications, they
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meenakshi vs Govt. Of Nctd on 2 November, 2016

time of making application pursuant to the advertisement issued in 2013, became overage as in the advertisement dated 24.10.2011 the maximum age limit ... know that her candidature was rejected on the ground of her being overage for the Post Code 02/13, vide rejection notice dated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neelam vs M/O Culture on 4 May, 2018

some others were shown to have been rejected as they being overage by the crucial date. Therefore, the applicants made representations requesting the respondent-National ... crucial date stipulated in the Notice/Advertisement, they have become overage. Therefore, the respondent-National Archives of India ought to have granted them age relaxation
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next