date i.e. 01.01.2019,
4
the petitioners would be overage, but as on the date of
Advertisement they are within the age limit ... petitioners have applied pursuant to the Advertisement
dated 31.07.2018, they being overage on 01.01.2019, they
have been rendered ineligible; the respondents have not
provided
some others were shown to have been
rejected as they being overage by the crucial date. Therefore, the applicants
made representations requesting the respondent-National ... crucial date
stipulated in the Notice/Advertisement, they have become overage.
Therefore, the respondent-National Archives of India ought to have granted
them age relaxation
rejection of her candidature was
mentioned in the remarks column as "Overage".
1.6 The applicant made a representation 16.12.2014 to and served
legal ... DSSSB that rejection of her candidature on the ground of her
being overage was arbitrary and discriminatory, and the office order No.344,
dated
writ petitioner in
the year 2006 and on account of overage, another application was submitted by
the writ petitioner with a request to provide appointment ... writ petitioner in the year 2006. Subsequently, on
account of overage, the application submitted initially cannot be converted
for the purpose of securing appointment
Delhi Police on compassionate ground was
rejected on the ground of overage, which causing great prejudice to
the applicant.
3
3.1 Pursuant to notice issued ... applicant's case was
rejected on the ground that he is overage, which is factually
incorrect as the applicant is eligible for the post
eight years or so and by now she
might have become overage for Government service; (ii) she
has been legitimately expecting for the outcome
Ram Janak Maurya And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic ... on 1
some of the applicants before the U.P. PSC had become overage and were no longer eligible to apply. There are no details available ... appointed from the select list of the U.P. PSC had become overage by the time the advertisement of the Selection Commission came
writ petitioner was rejected on the ground that he
was overaged. Even on the date of death of the deceased employee, the
petitioner had completed ... writ petitioner was rejected on
the ground that he was already overaged and as per the terms and conditions of
the scheme
first respondent in
proceedings dated 13.01.2011, stating that the petitioner was overaged.
Even, at the time of death of the deceased employee, the writ petitioner
