floor,
MACT NO.602/21 Vishnu Mandal v. Balram & Ors. P.No. 1 Of 22 BK
:2:
60 Skylark no.5, Nehru Place Road ... insurer of the
MACT NO.602/21 Vishnu Mandal v. Balram & Ors. P.No. 2 Of 22 BK
:3:
offending vehicle.
5. No Written
p.m. on the same day but next
day on 07.05.2011 at about 7:00 p.m., his son Balram made call on
the mobile ... evening on 06.05.2011 at about 8:00 or 8:15 p.m.;
that Balram called his brother, deceased Rakesh, in the morning
complaint against accused P.S. Bhardwaj.
23. The Ld. Defence counsel has further argued that accused P.S.
CBI Vs. P.S. Bhardwaj ... significance of the said reaction was explained by Inspector S.P.
Singh and thereafter, Balram was asked to wash his hands with
soap. The complainant
complaint against accused P.S. Bhardwaj.
23. The Ld. Defence counsel has further argued that accused P.S.
CBI Vs. P.S. Bhardwaj ... significance of the said reaction was explained by Inspector S.P.
Singh and thereafter, Balram was asked to wash his hands with
soap. The complainant
charge-sheet were supplied to both accused
Balram and Neeraj in compliance of section 207 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, vide
order dated 12/03/2013 ... accused Balram Ex.P-1, empty cartridge Ex.P-2, rehri
Ex.P-3 and piece of wood of rehri Ex.P-4.
8. TESTIMONIES
accused Balram with Sonia when she went to
the house of accused Balram. She also admitted that her
marriage with accused Balram was performed with ... accused Balram.
She further deposed that the accused Balram never
kidnapped and confined her. She deposed that she
remained in the house of Balram happily
Sagar s/o Hari Ram R/o Vill.
accused Balram Pur, P S Mahawan,
Distt. Mathura UP.
Naresh @ Anna s/o Bhojraj
Singh ... Village Balram Pur,
P S Mahawan, Distt. Mathura
UP.
Sonu @ Totla s/o Mast Ram
Singh R/o Village Baich P S
sikarpur, Distt. Bulandsahar
case are that on 06.04.04 at about
12.30 p.m SI Balram Singh alognwith Ct.Hemender, Ct.Rattan Singh, Ct. Ajeet
and Ct.Janardhan were ... Balram was doing the writing work under the street light but SI Balram
PW13 has stated that he left the spot at 5 p
report was that the cheque Ex.P2 and
requisition slip Ex.P4 bore signatures of Balram Tiwari at the back side.
However, this ... accused Balram Tiwari as it is
clear from the statement of the witnesses that accused Balram Tiwari had
not presented the cheque Ex.P
upon
judgments Thomas Vs Kerala State 2004 Crl Law Journal 1273, P. Balram
Vs State 1991 Crl L Journal 166, Mupparaju Nageswara Rao Vs State
