Balram vs State Of U.P. on 8 October, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 ALL 3299
Author: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Bench: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
HIGH ... learned Sessions Judge framed charge under Section 302 I.P.C. against accused-Balram, which was read over and explained to the accused to which
Chouhan, P.W. 2 is
Parmeshwar Pandey, P.W.3 is Indal Chouhan, P.W.4 is Satyendra
Chouhan, P.W.5 is Balram Chauhan ... learned
12
A.P.P further referred to evidence of P.W.1, Ramdeni Choudhan
whose statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C was recorded
State vs . Kunwar Pal @ K.P. S/O Sh. Balram R/O ... on 8 February, 2012
1
IN THE COURT OF SH. J. R. ARYAN ... Unique Case ID No. 02402R0305212010
State Vs. Kunwar Pal @ K.P. S/o Sh. Balram R/o First Pusta,
New Usmanpur, Delhi
with Minni and Balram. Minni and Balram used to come to the house of her parents. At the time of incident Balram was wearing ... from the village of incident. Both P.W.1 and P.W. 2 have given contradictory statements, as P.W. 1 has stated
witness to
support the impugned order of conviction.
7. Learned A.P.P. on the other hand submitted that the
prosecution case is that ... appellant and learned
A.P.P., scrutinizing the evidences on record, we find that:
P.W.-1 Balram Oraon, is a hearsay witness
Ravi, aged about 25 years S/o Balram Bishoi, R/o
Kondagaon, Forest Colony, Allbeda para, P.S. Kondagaon, District Kondagaon
(C.G.)
....Appellant
Versus
Code of
Criminal Procedure (in short ' Cr.P.C .) was recorded and the accused
examined Balram as DW1 in his defence. After hearing ... ignored the admission of signatures of the
accused-respondent on documents Ex.P-13 to Ex.P-146 which pertained to
the period during which
electric short circuit.
13. Balram Tiwari (PW-3) is the witness of seizure effected vide seizure memo
Ex.P-2.
14. I.A. Siddique
allowed for appeal/revision.
No one has appeared for the appellant Subash @ Balram
(appellant in CRA No.S-1936-SB of 2011). Therefore, Ms. Sumanjit ... driving the car with registration No. DL 1- CH 0012. Subash @
Balram (appellant in CRA No. S-1936-SB of 2011), was sitting by
AMIT KHANCHI
Sagar Shahni vs State Of U.P. on 18 August, 2021
Author: Ali Zamin
Bench: Ali Zamin
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court ... Applicant :- Sagar Shahni
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Balram Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin