down
in decision passed by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in P. Chidambaram v.
ED' 2019 SCC Online SC 1380 and Arnab Goswami
Sandeep Kumar Balmiki
and ors.
(2009) 17 SCC 555
( xv) P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
(2019) 9 SCC 24
Heard learned counsel ... Supreme Court in
the judgment rendered in P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of
Enforcement (supra) :-
"Observing that economic offences constitute a class apart
and need
Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote &
Ors. ,(1980) 2 SCC 559;
h. P.Chidambaram v. CBI , 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1380;
i. D.K.Shivakumar v. Directorate ... Prabhakar
Rajaram Kharote & Ors., (1980) 2 SCC 559; P.Chidambaram v.
CBI, 2009 SCC OnLine SC 1380 and D.K.Shivakumar v.
Directorate
PETITION NO.21120 OF 2001
AND W.P.NOS.21121 AND 21122 OF 2001
AND W.M.P.NO.31222 OF 2001.
1.R.Bhagwan ... stated therein.
!For the petitioners
in all the Wps. : Mr.P.Chidambaram
Senior Counsel for
Mr.S.Silambanan
where after making reference to the earlier decision in case of
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement4 , the Court focused
upon the issue whether economic
apprehension expressed by CBI."
(emphasis supplied)
20. Most recently, in P. Chidambaram vs. CBI10 the Supreme Court
has held :
"22. The jurisdiction ... applications filed by the
prosecution. ......"
(emphasis supplied)
21. Furthermore in P. Chidambaram vs. Directorate of
Enforcement11 , the Supreme Court has explained the concept
counsel for the applicants has placed reliance upon case
titled " P. Chidambaram Vs Directorate of Enforcement " bearing Criminal
Appeal No. 1831/2019, wherein ... Apex Court has granted bail to P.
Chidambaram under Section 3 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
12. Reliance is also placed upon case
already been dealt with by this Court in the case of P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement , (2020) 13 SCC 791, after taking note ... laid down in the following judgments, will govern the field:--
Precedents
- P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement , (2020) 13 SCC 791:
23. Thus, from cumulative
submits
that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of P.
Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement , (2019) 9 SCC
24 held that economic offence ... they affect economic fabric of society and therefore under
Section 438 Cr.P.C. being an extraordinary remedy should
be exercised sparingly. Learned counsel
23289 of 2020
Vijay Kumar Nair Vs. State of M.P.
70-80 crores G.S.T. per anum on an average. Their
detention would ... upon Joti Prasad Vs.
State of Haryana 1993 supp. SCC 497, P.
Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforecement
2019 Lawsuit (SC) 1947, D.K. Sethi