R.P. Nos.1533 and 2140 of
2015.
14. The arguments advanced by Sri K. Rajanna, learned
counsel for the petitioners in C.R.P ... Contractors , State of Tamil Nadu, v. R. Sundaram ,
Sri Prashanth Spinners Limited v. Chunnilal Pranjivandass and
Company , P. Kandasamy v. Neyveli Lignite Corporation
Limited , Mahesh
Income-tax , [1967] 63 I.T.R. 572 (All.) and Commissioner of Income-tax v. Sundaram & Company (P .) Ltd., . The learned counsel further submitted ... Ethel Rodrigues v. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty , [1963] 49 I.T.R. (E.D.) 128 (Mys. ), Khan Bahadur Ahmed Alladin & Sons v. Commisssoner
Court in the order of his reference dated 4.8.1997 in C.R.P. No. 4040 of 1995 referred the following questions to a Division Bench ... P. , (supra) (sic); D.L. Sathyanarayana v. K. Radhakrishnaiah, (supra) ; P. Venkateswarlu v. Motor and General Traders , (supra).
16. In S. Sundaram v. V.R
p.217 (b) Maxwell's Statutory Interpretation, 12th edn., p.189.
25. In S. Sundaram Filial v. V.R. Pattabiraman , a Division Bench ... Sudhakar Reddy v. Government of A.P. , a Division Bench of this Court after referring to Sundaram Pillai 's case (supra), and other Supreme
everything is in its place.
25. The Full Bench in A.P.S.R.T.C. 's case (supra) clearly held that authorisation ... apex court in S. SUNDARAM v. R. PATTABHIRAMAN ". The meaning of "note" as per P. Ramanatha Aiyar's Law Lexicon
examined as P.W.1 and one Dr.R.Shanmuga Sundaram was
examined as P.W.2 and Exs.A.1 to A.8 were
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Polisetty Somasundaram (P) Ltd. on 29 August, 1996
Equivalent citations: (1997)140CTR(AP)497, [1997]225ITR123(AP), [1997]95TAXMAN388 ... Author: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
Bench: R. Bayapu Reddy , S.S Mohammed Quadri
JUDGMENT
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.
1. Pursuant to the direction
Buddha Jagadeeswara Rao vs Sri Ravi Enterprises Rep. By Its ... on 23 August, 2016
Author
Veera Swamy Shanmugam Sundaram vs The State Of A.P. on 22 June, 2001
Equivalent citations ... 2001CRILJ3787
JUDGMENT
D.S.R. Varma, J.
1. This is an appeal filed by the accused-appellant against the Judgment passed by the learned IInd
strongly relied on R.M. Sundaram v. C.M. Ramraj, 1993(3) Crimes 175; Shashi Finance Corporation v. Super Shine Abrasives (P) Ltd., Hyderabad ... such person is there in that address.
6. No doubt, in R.M. Sundaram's case (supra), in Shashi Finance Corporation 's case
