Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Piyush Jain vs The Election Commission Of India on 19 December, 2003 Equivalent citations: 109(2004)DLT470, 2004(72)DRJ642 Author: Badar Durrez Ahmed Bench

Piyush Jain And Ors vs State And Anr on 2 May, 2023 Author: Dinesh Kumar Sharma Bench: Dinesh Kumar Sharma Neutral Citation Number ... COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3117/2023 PIYUSH JAIN AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ravinder Narayan, Mr.Rahul Sharma, Mr.Madhav

Padam Chand Jain vs Piyush Jain & Others on 14 July, 2011 Author: Indermeet Kaur Bench: Indermeet Kaur * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... 2011 PADAM CHAND JAIN ...........Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate. Versus PIYUSH JAIN & OTHERS ..........Respondents Through: Mr. Parag

lakhs claimed to have been received from one Piyush Jain through an account payee cheque; the said donor failed to appear before ... under Section 68 , stated to be received as corpus donation from Piyush Jain, the CIT (Appeals) after ITA Nos.321/2013, 322/2013

Finding sufficient evidence against the accused persons, namely Dilip, Ramesh, Piyush Jain, Rohit Chopra, Bharat Jhamb, and Praveen - were arrested, who made their disclosure statement ... Kulwant Verma. The petitioner No.1 and co-accused Piyush Jain, Rohit Chjopra and Praveen are friends. Petitioner No.1/Bharat Jhamb for taking revenge

Civil) GNCTD for R-1. Mr. Mridul ain and Mr. Piyush Jain, Advocates for R-2 and 3. Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Advocate ... Sudan Bhoyana, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Mridul Jain and Mr. Piyush Jain, Advocates for R-2 and 3. Ms. Savita Prabhakar and Mr. Amit

employment. 34. On the other hand, Insurance company examined Sh. Piyush Jain, Branch Manager as R3W1. Sh. Piyush Jain stated that a notice ... different view". 37. The insurance company has examined Sh. Piyush Jain, who proved the notice u/o 12 rule 8 CPC but failed

employment. 34. On the other hand, Insurance company examined Sh. Piyush Jain, Branch Manager as R3W1. Sh. Piyush Jain stated that a notice ... different view". 37. The insurance company has examined Sh. Piyush Jain, who proved the notice u/o 12 rule 8 CPC but failed

OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Mansie Jain, Adv. 43 + W.P.(C) 2452/2022 & CM APPL.7066/2022 ... 10035/2022 STRATAGEM PORTFOLIO (P) LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Gautam Jain & Mr.Piyush Kumar Kamal, Advs. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE

Shekhar, Sr.Advocate, Instructed by Mr.Vishal Saxena and Mr.Piyush Jain, Advocates WP(C)No.2854/2011 UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented ... Shekhar, Sr.Advocate, Instructed by Mr.Vishal Saxena and Mr.Piyush Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG