Parkash Sharma who is and/or was a pseudonym for respondent No.1 and the aforesaid posters were pasted in conspicuous place in the Delhi ... Shri Om parkash Sharma, Secretary, Yuvak Samaj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, is a pseudonym for Shri Brij Mohan.
In this connection it is necessary to turn
conducted on the said date. The result was declared on 04.10.2022. A
pseudonymous complaint was received by the respondent-Corporation on
07.11.2022 alleging certain shortcomings ... specific instructions to all the Administrative authorities not to act upon the
pseudonymous complaints and thus the authority erred in cancelling the result
action being
taken by the respondent-authorities on the basis of pseudonymous complaint
dated 16.12.2020. It is stated that action on pseudonymous complaints is
barred ... letter dated 21.12.2020, it is reported that
complaint dated 15.12.2020 was pseudonymous as there is no person with
the name of Naresh residing in Patel
Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, whereby on the basis of a
pseudonymous complaint filed against the petitioner taking a plea that the
petitioner ... report. Counsel for the
petitioner has now asserted that this being a pseudonymous complaint,
which has been filed against the petitioner, the same could
honesty, complete dedication and to entire satisfaction
of her superiors. However, certain pseudonymous complaints were received
against petitioner. It is stated that the said complaints ... petitioner was serving, in his note dated 18.10.1989, that on receipt of
pseudonymous complaints giving details of the cases and allegations of receipt
of illegal
Department has formulated a policy on the subject of action of
anonymous/pseudonymous and repeated complaints by framing
different guidelines. After due consideration ... carry both name and address of the complainant.
(ii)'Pseudonymous complaints' are such complaints which
bear false or fictitious name
respondents not to proceed with inquiry on the basis of a
anonymous/pseudonymous complaint (Annexure P-1).
iii) It is further prayed that during pendency ... that the respondents-authorities cannot hold an enquiry into
an anonymous/pseudonymous complaint in view of the instructions of the
government and as such
unknown under the ancient Hind Law as no name equivalent or pseudonymous to Will has been traced either in Sanskrit or in the vernacular languages
alleged
complainant, i.e. Major P.S.Hundal, it became a pseudonymous complaint,
which could not have been entertained.
Further, learned counsel laid great emphasis
these circumstances have been
explained in detail in the reply. Even a pseudonymous complaint
received in the Raj Bhawan was placed before His Highness
