view that they should have been filed before the Sessions Judge, Puri, and that he had no jurisdiction to entertain them.
4. The following questions ... cases exclusively triable by
Magistrate in the district of Puri or have the
Magistrate at Cuttack co-ordinate jurisdiction?
(iii) Were the revision before
Sumati vs Sarla Puri on 9 February, 2009
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ... 6589/2008
SUMATI .... PETITIONER
Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate
Versus
SARLA PURI ... RESPONDENT
Through Mr. G.D. Gandhi, Advocate
CORAM
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE
Muggu ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ...Respondent
CRM-M-50110-2021
Rakesh Puri ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ... done business with M/s Khushi
Enterprises through its dealer/accused Rakesh Puri
and agent/accused Dinesh Raj and Vishal Bansal
(who had stated himself
under Annexures-4 & 5
passed by learned S.D.J.M., Puri and 3rd Additional
Sessions Judge, Puri respectively and has further prayed ... before the learned S.D.J.M., Puri.
The accusations were that, the accused persons including
the petitioner by illegally managing the international
telephone call
Pardeep Puri And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 14 December, 2015
Author: Jaswant Singh
Bench: Jaswant Singh
262
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Date of Decision: 14.12.2015
Pardeep Puri and others
.......... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present
Anand Puri vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 September, 2022
Author: Anil Verma
Bench: Anil Verma
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA ... SEPTEMBER, 2022
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 44986 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
ANAND PURI S/O KAILASH
PURI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: LABOUR
Mukesh Puri vs State Of U.T. Chandigarh on 28 June, 2021
Author: Arvind Singh Sangwan
Bench: Arvind Singh Sangwan
CASE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ... 21835 of 2021 (O&M)
Date of decision: 28.06.2021
Mukesh Puri
....Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh
....Respondent
CORAM
trial, an application was
moved by the prosecution for summoning Ajay Puri respondent as
accused. The application was declined by the trial Court. The
allegations ... levelled against Ajay Puri were that he was a party to the
criminal conspiracy for commission of offence under Section 420 by
Karaj Singh
Harish Puri vs State Of Punjab And Another on 28 January, 2010
Author: S.S. Saron
Bench: S.S. Saron
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Misc. No. M-283 of 2009
Date of decision : 28.1.2010
Harish Puri
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.... Respondents
Present : Mr. H.K. Aurora
Puri Praveen Kumar vs The State Of Telangana Another on 8 August, 2018
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION
