Bommegowda vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 1992
betterment of the village community. It is almost a parallel Government functioning at the village level. The main theme and the central object of creating
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2232 (1.36 seconds)Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wadiyar vs Sri Venkateswara Real Estate ... on 4 April, 1989
land is acquired by the Government in the 'A' Schedule property parallel to the Railway Line either for the purpose of the Railways
N. Krishan (Decd. By Legal ... vs Settlement Commission And Ors. on 10 March, 1989
existence of profits was withdrawn by the Government of India. Further, the petitioner had to establish a parallel unit for the manufacture of hose clips ... petitioner.
6. In accordance with the conditions imposed by the Government of India, a parallel unit for manufacture of hose clips, namely "Avalon Fasteners
Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wadiyar vs Sri Venkateswara Real Estate ... on 20 April, 1989
Bangalore).
(8) If any land is acquired by the Government in the schedule A property parallel to the railway line either for the purpose
Chidananda Urs B.G vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 August, 2022
When the things stood thus, the State Government
created Anti Corruption Bureau in Karnataka by Government Order
dated 14.3.2016 and issued notifications dated 19.03.2016
authorizing ... representations made before the learned
Single Judge, the State Government by Government Order dated
14.3.2016, has created Anti Corruption Bureau in Karnataka, which
would
Sadanandaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 12 October, 1993
subject to the pleasure of the Government, it could be terminated also at the pleasure of the Government. As we have discussed earlier the scheme ... represents an almost parallel scheme necessarily indicates that a nominated First Member by the Government on the Urban Development Authority can be recalled
State Of Karnataka And Anr. vs Annayya on 8 September, 2003
State.
3. In this behalf the learned High Court Government Pleader submitted that a parallel proceedings has been initiated against the accused persons as well
Milestone Real Estate Fund vs Prisha Properties India Private ... on 31 July, 2019
Code. However, on a working of the Code, the
Government realized that parallel proceedings
in the High Court as well as before the
adjudicating authority
Abdur Rahim Ahmed vs State Of Mysore And Anr. on 23 June, 1965
Calcutta High Court in Nripendra Nath Bagchi v. Chief Secretary, Government of West Bengal and other [1961 - II L.L.J. 312] fully supports ... extreme case, probably not having any parallel. The High Court quashed the proceedings holding that the Government had no competence to initiate disciplinary proceedings against
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. And ... vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 1 August, 2005
Government order, but the condition which is independently imposed for the first time on the petitioner in terms of the Government order and the Government ... nature and extent of benefits were got varied from Government order to Government order also indicates that the petitioner had been differently treated from