respondent No. 1 and thus
he was not entitled to seek partial preemption and the suit was
rightly dismissed by the trial Court.
3. Briefly ... holding that plaintiff/respondent No. 1 was
debarred from seeking a partial preemption. The trial Court had
relied upon the Sale Deeds executed prior
suffers from an error.
The learned court below held that partial preemption
ought not to be allowed, although it appears from the records
that preemption ... preemption in respect of the other plot
was allowed.
Prima facie, it appears that the preemption
application was not filed claiming partial preemption.
Let this
therefore,
he was a co-sharer?
(II) Whether the law of preemption was applicable to the
shop in question, which is not applicable to business ... Exhibits A1 & A2.
2.10 Learned trial Court decided Issue No.(I) partially in
favour of plaintiff, Issue No.(II) against defendants, Issue
K.B. Harlalka vs . Devender Kumar Aggarwal on 11 August, 2023
K.B. Harlalka Vs
