were differences between the partners of the petitioner
firm. This is apparent from the application filed by one of the
partners ... said case, customs authorities had failed to release the
goods in spite of the order of unconditional release passed by the
Chief Commissioner
shown in the invoice; secondly, to forthwith release the goods seized from the residence of the partners of the petitioner without levying any fine ... from the residence of a partners of the petitioner are concerned, it has to be mentioned that these were released in February
partner.
16. Learned SDR would contend that the appellant had accepted the impugned order which granted them permission to release the goods for export
Bihari Lal, who will be hereinafter referred to as the detenues, are partners of the firm, M/s Delhi Rajkot Enamel Works. They were detained ... quashed the orders of detention passed against the detenues and directed their release. In pursuance of the said judgment of this Court, the detenues were
Veetrag Enterprises
Represented by its Partner Mr.Chetan Ranka,
39/5, Ekambareshwarar Agraharam,
Park Town, Chennai-600 003. .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Customs ... India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to Release the goods viz., 760 Packages viz., 3800 Packets of Coated Gummed Paper imported
relied upon the statements of Sagarmal Jain and Nanalal Jain, the two partners. Sagarmal Jain was present at the time of search ... order impugned in these appeals, has ordered release of gold. He has also ordered release of foreign mark gold found at the premises of Sagarmal
means of the instant application, the applicant is seeking his release on bail in Criminal Case No. 7646 of 2022 in the Court of learned ... been stated in the complaint that the applicant is one of the partners in the firm M/S Odochem Industries and he used to operate
Goalpara, Assam. This firm was constituted in the year 1972 with three partners, two of whom are the appellants before us and the third ... released on March 22, 1977, on the lifting of the Emergency. The Competent Authority, therefore, felt that both the appellants being partners of the said
vide letter dated 11.01.2013 requested the Assistant Director of DRI to provisionally release the goods after taking of samples and weighment of goods. Undertaking ... followed, vide other letters also. The petitioner's request for provisional release of goods was fully covered by Provisions of Section
firm registered with the registrar of firms. The petitioner claims that the partners of the petitioner are citizens of India and the petitioner is dealing ... Refuse for Joss Sticks. It is claimed that one of the partners of the petitioner in his individual capacity, at the material time, was working
