opportunity and trial to the Petitioner,
it was incumbent to decide the application under Section 340 C.P.C.
before conclusion of the trial ... would show that the IO had committed the offence of perjury and the
application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. should have been decided before
desire to lead
any evidence in the aforesaid application during the pendency of
the aforesaid application.
CS NO. 62/02 YUSUF KHAN VS. SARFARAZ ... Mohd. Naseem Advocate had
committed perjury as alleged in the present application by
forging the signatures of applicant / defendant no. 6 Mohd.
Shaukeen
desire to lead
any evidence in the aforesaid application during the pendency of
the aforesaid application.
CS NO. 61/2002 SALMA VS. SARFARAZ ... Mohd. Naseem Advocate had
committed perjury as alleged in the present application by
forging the signatures of applicant / defendant no. 6 Mohd.
Shaukeen
desire to lead
any evidence in the aforesaid application during the pendency of
the aforesaid application.
CS NO. 60/2/10 AFSARI VS. SARFARAZ ... Mohd. Naseem Advocate had
committed perjury as alleged in the present application by
forging the signatures of applicant / defendant no. 6 Mohd.
Shaukeen
facts necessary for the purpose of disposal of the
instant application are that the present applicant was charge
sheeted vide FIR No.227/1991 ... sentence was set
aside.
3. It has been stated in the application that it is a settled law
that when a man makes an statement
above, which was directed by the order dated 19.2.2010 in the bail application of Pintoo Singh and others, and also what steps they now propose ... where witnesses are likely to turn hostile, to facilitate prosecuting witnesses for perjury if they change their stance in Court, initiating steps for prosecuting
registered or numbered unless this court condones the delay on an application that may be made in that behalf by the appellants ... present application is concerned, in our opinion, to allow such application, despite the wrong statements made in the application verified on solemn affirmation, would
statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. for the fear of
perjury.
10. In the present case, we do not find any scope ... case
within 15 days from today. On his appearance and
application for bail he shall be released on bail on such terms
and conditions
State Of U.P vs Paras Nath Singh & Ors on 15 January, 1973
Equivalent
Rajesh Prasad vs The State Of Bihar And Anr. Etc. on 7 January, 2022
Author
