secured.
9.5. Respondent No.8 – Pension Fund Regulatory & Development Authority
(PFRDA)
9.5.1 It is submitted that PFRDA is a statutory authority established ... schemes of pension funds.
9.5.2 It is further submitted that Circular no. PFRDA/2020/46/SUP-CRA/18
dated 06.10.2020 prescribes the norms
Date of Decision: 15th March, 2017
PENSION FUND REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(PFRDA) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate.
Versus
SUBROTO DAS ..... Respondent
Through ... filed by Subroto Das against the Pension Fund Regulatory &
Development Authority (PFRDA, for short).
2. Dr. Praffula Ranjan and Sunil Agarwal had filed
they are not
mandatorily to be included under the NPS regulated by
PFRDA Act, 2013 and that they are eligible to be covered by
Part ... Kerala departed
from the NPS designed by the Government of India under
PFRDA Act. The petitioners argue that the action
letter dated 21.04.2014 issued
by the Pension Fund Regulatory & Development Authority (PFRDA)
whereby their commercial bid was not considered inasmuch as according ... PFRDA the petitioner no. 1 did not satisfy the „eligibility criteria‟
regarding profits after providing for depreciation, interest and tax in all
the immediately preceding
pronouncement : 18.11.2024
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority
(PFRDA) objects to the award dated 08.03.2022 and final award dated
05.08.2022 passed ... Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
OMP (Comm) 53/2022 1/20
PFRDA Vs. Munish Malik
2. Facts of the case relevant for disposal of objections
Chairman of the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development
Authority (hereafter "PFRDA", for short) as the 3 (three)
respondents in that order, the Association ... such scheme; and
(d) the resolutions under which the PFRDA is functioning be
declared as ultra vires the Constitution and the same may,
accordingly
Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority
(hereinafter referred to as 'the PFRDA'). The petitioners also
sought a direction upon the respondent authorities ... submit a legal heir certificate to settle the NPS amount lying
with PFRDA.
6. Assailing the impugned order, as contained in
Annexure
clear that the respondents have neither remitted the
contribution to PFRDA constituted under the Act of 2013 nor it is clear that
whether petitioners have ... been given same returns as have been given by the
PFRDA on the deposits made before the said authority. Even it is not clear
whether
clear that the respondents have neither remitted the contribution to
PFRDA constituted under the Act of 2013 nor it is clear that whether petitioners
have ... been given same returns as have been given by the PFRDA on the deposits
made before the said authority. Even it is not clear whether
clear that the respondents have neither remitted the contribution to
PFRDA constituted under the Act of 2013 nor it is clear that whether petitioners
have ... been given same returns as have been given by the PFRDA on the deposits
made before the said authority. Even it is not clear whether
