Sh. Vinay Sakhuja vs State on 4 March, 2017
Sh. Vinay Sakhuja vs State on 4 March, 2017
IN THE COURT OF SH. SANJAY
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 910 (4.31 seconds)Narsinga Rao vs . State Of Ap; Sc 2001 Crl.Lj. 515 (2) ... on 20 December, 2021
when it was sent to Photo Division and
these facts does not rule out possibility of manipulation. It is also
submitted that prosecution failed
State vs Joginder Solanki @ Ravi on 28 February, 2024
State vs Joginder Solanki @ Ravi on 28 February, 2024
IN THE COURT OF MS. GURMOHINA
State vs Gurpreet @ Lali Etc on 14 February, 2025
complainant
would take the trouble of getting manipulated photographs
made and that these photos clearly show that the accused
was apprehended
Sukh Sareen vs Vivek Mishra on 13 October, 2025
produced a mobile
photo of the "original" version (Ex. DW1/1, 2 pages) to
demonstrate manipulation, asserting no liability as the cheques ... fabricated" and produced a mobile
photo (Ex. DW1/1) purporting to show "manipulation." He
offered no forensic analysis, handwriting expert opinion
Shri Syed Nazim Ali vs Shri Om Prakash Dwedi on 18 January, 2011
photo copy produced
by defendant no.1 does not bear the signature of the plaintiff. Thus,
it is clear that the photo copy produced ... clear that there is
manipulation in mentioning the rate of rent in the photo copy. It is
clear from this document Mark
Sh. Gurinder Singh vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd on 1 October, 2009
meter to manipulate the consumption
unauthorizedly, due to which meter was slow by
53.67%. In this way the consumer had manipulated
the recorded consumption ... recorded by M/s. Arora Photo Studio. He has denied that
the CMRI data has been manipulated.
: 22 :
In so far as DW2 is concerned
State vs Satish ("Acquitted") Page 1 Of 14 on 10 September, 2013
loopholes in the case of prosecution which create
reasonable doubt. Firstly, the photo frames are not shown to have been sealed
State V/s Satish ... whose statement, the photo frames had been
produced before the Court in unsealed condition. Thus, there was every
possibility of manipulation in the case property
Sh. Jai Shankar vs Ms. Poonam Bala on 8 May, 2012
producing two photos of the entrance door of the tenancy
premises to show name plate of appellant firm. The same
could not be produced before ... respondent opposed the
application orally by submitting that photos can be
manipulated at any time. Additional evidence cannot be
allowed to fill
Through vs Riaz Khan @ Wasim Khan on 22 August, 2016
denied that photographs taken by photographer are false and
manipulated and have been created by photo mixing technique later on.
He further stated that