Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (1.53 seconds)

Mathew P.Varghese vs Union Of India on 31 May, 2016

vacancies of the year 1996-2005 which was notified for physically handicapped candidates. The applicant is a physically handicapped person. Annexure A1 notification for that ... applicable to SC/ST persons is to be extended to physically handicapped candidates. Therefore, respondents conducted a review and granted benefit to the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - P Gopinath - Full Document

C.R. Binu vs Union Of India on 9 June, 2016

vacancies notified in the year 2010, one was reserved for physically handicapped. There was no claimant available under physically handicapped quota in Mavelikkara Postal Division ... candidate on merit quota. There is no justification in keeping physically handicapped quota for promotion for years together. As per the scheme followed
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

P.M.Balan vs The General Manager on 14 March, 2017

Plumber at Mangalore. One of the incumbents is a totally physically handicapped person. According to the respondents it is not possible to meet the daily ... requirements by using that physically handicapped person. It is to the other post, which is lying vacant, the applicant has been transferred. Therefore, according
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs Pg Institute Of Medical Education And ... on 13 February, 2018

appointment against the post of Sanitary Attendant Grade-II under physically Handicapped (Ortho), OBC category. 2. The facts, which led for filing of the instant ... with the closing date of 27.1.2016. The applicant, who is physically handicapped, (ortho), and also belongs to OBC category, being eligible, applied. He was subjected
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1   2 3 Next