question of cancellation of sale-
deed whereby a wrong number of plot has been stated, could not have
been allowed by the trial Court ... entire case of the defendant is on the basis that wrong plot
numbers have been stated in the sale-deed executed in favour
workman and the same was allowed
wherein on account of wrong mentioning of plot number, lien
is created on the property of the petitioner ... Babulal Modi, Mamlatdar, Surat city
submitted that on account of the wrong plot number
mentioned by the workman, the mistake has arisen. She could
prejudice has been caused to the petitioner by wrong mentioning of
the plot numbers when the petitioner has understood and accepted
that the actual land ... there was no wrong description of the total area which was taken
possession. Wrong mentioning of number of plots is of no consequence
that there was a misdiscription of the plot by giving the wrong survey number 186. The learned Single Judge of that court however, took
concerned wrong doers irrespective of survey
numbers/block numbers of the land. It is pertinent to
note that the said unauthorized & illegal construction ... unauthorized
construction on the plots allotted by the Gujarat Slum
Clearance Board while some of the plots are still open
plots.
6. In view
principal
borrower as well as the guarantor with regard
to nonagricultural plot no.23, situated at
Takudipara, Street no.5, being part of revenue ... error and plot no.23, situated on the very
survey number being part of survey no.55, plot
no.22 is wrongly mentioned. Mr. Mihir
Application No.16016 of 2003, inasmuch as plot
number of the land in question has been wrongly
mentioned as 120/1 instead ... passed:
In Paragraph2.1 of the abovementioned judgment,
the plot number of the land in question shall be read
as 102/1 instead
Application No.16016 of 2003, inasmuch as plot
number of the land in question has been wrongly
mentioned as 120/1 instead ... passed:
In Paragraph2.1 of the abovementioned judgment,
the plot number of the land in question shall be read
as 102/1 instead
referred to the plot of the
petitioner as bearing No.472/1 in Sector-12 in
Gandhinagar, instead of plot No.471/1.
2. Heard ... prayers made in Civil Application No.901 of 2016
had wrongly mentioned the plot number to be 472/1,
instead of 471/1. Under
undeveloped
plots namely the agricultural plots comprising in Survey Nos.51/2,
51/3 and 61/p/1 and the developed industrial plots carved ... GIDC, is based on wrong and misplaced
opinion. The exchange of fully developed plots (20 in number) in an
Industrial estate with the under-developed
