building construction plan by giving a plot
number, which belonged to him. That particular plot number being R.S.
Plot No.564 is alleged ... separate plot number
was mentioned in that application. The different plot number was '568'
which was mentioned. In fact, the said plot
plaintiff (s) by the government as well as ex-landlord had wrong plot numbers
which were mentioned as admitted in para ... plaintiff by the Government as well as ex-landlord had wrong plot
numbers which did not correspond to the suit property as detailed
finding that Plot No. 1028 should have been numbered as Plot No. 1027 and Plot No. 1027 should have been numbered as Plot ... fact that Plot No. 1028 should have been numbered as Plot No. 1027 and Plot No. 1027 should have been numbered as Plot
vide
sale deed No. 3850 by mentioning wrong khata number as 220/563
and wrong plot number as 5847/6354 and had received
executed a sale-deed by committing cheating and forgery by
mentioning wrong plot number. It is submitted that the allegation against the
petitioner is false
executed a sale-deed by committing cheating and forgery by
mentioning wrong plot number. It is submitted that the allegation against the
petitioner is false
petitioner and corrected the plot numbers in the Revenue Records as plot
Nos. 391, 392 and 393 in place of plot ... wrong plot numbers are mentioned.
The original document is the settlement deed. As the plot numbers in the
said settlement deed was wrongly recorded
found by him that in the sale deed, plot number
has wrongly been mentioned as 1353, the complainant made a request to
the vendors ... purchased the land of Plot No.1351 from other persons, but according to
him the plot number had wrongly been mentioned in the sale deed
sale deed came to know that C.S. Plot number was wrongly
mentioned as 21 in the sale deed in place of C.S. plot ... necessary rather it is a simple suit for rectification of
plot number, which is wrongly mentioned in the sale deed and if the
intervenor
land
was not given in the said sale deed and inadvertently wrong plot numbers
were mentioned in it. The plaintiff taking advantage of the mistake
