number of Plot of
plot no. 537/3 was wrongly mentioned as 532/3. Certain
other plots held by the appellant although not hypothecated ... issued
in as much as wrong revenue numbers were mentioned therein.
(ii) that on account of wrong numbers being mentioned
property worth
also pub-
lished in the locality. But since the plot number of the
land was wrongly mentioned in the notification, a corrigen-
dum was published
also published in the locality. But since the plot number of the land was wrongly mentioned in the notification, a corrigendum was published cancelling
Plot No. 473B has been divided into two parts and out of
that final plot number, 473B has been sub-divided into four sub-
plots ... road in
existence. Final plot number 473B was divided into three plots of
land and one separate plot of land shown as open vacant premises
Appellant, Sabik Plot No.139 was a whole plot number and the
Lease Deed specifically records that a portion of Sabik Plot No. 139 forms ... extents
of land in the original Plot No.139 and newly created Plot No. 139/1370
were wrongly recorded. That is how the confusion
objection
on 05.04.1991, before respondent Nos.1-4 stating that
alternative plot shall not be allotted in the
6
exclusive name of Dhan Singh. Further ... further when objections through
representations were made to the wrongful application
of allotment, on number of dates.
Based on such averments it was prayed
flats/plots allotted to the allottees. In some
cases, at a much later date, possession of some other flat/plot was
offered at an increased ... refusal to deliver possession, yet
possession was not delivered for a number of years even after monies
had been received. In some cases the construction
view of the fact that the respondent admitted that there
are number of plots, houses and shops in his possession, the lower
appellate court could ... Whether in view of the admission of the respondent the trial court
wrongly placed onus on the appellant to prove that the alternative
accommodation
Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014
Equivalent citations: 2014 AIR SCW
mortgage suit of the Bank, the Katha number
of the property is wrongly given. The plaintiffs have offered a
simple and acceptable explanation by pointing ... item (3), Katha number is mentioned as 53 instead of 95. The
correct katha number is 53 as is evident from
