land in possession of the private
opposite parties, even though wrong plot numbers and
khata number had been mentioned in the sale deed.
Accordingly, direction ... provisions of
Transfer of Property Act , even though wrong plot numbers
and khata number are mentioned in the sale deed. Had
there been any instruction
appellate court held
that there was nothing on record to demonstrate that plot no 6553
and 6553/10439 was the subject matter in schedule ... evidence on record that the Pleader
Commissioner had mentioned the wrong khesra/plot number(s)
by mistake or in collusion of the parties. The allotment
plot Nos. had been mentioned and as such the plaintiff on the basis of the Court sale had not acquired title upon the plots ... year 1938 out of the three plots, number of one of them was wrongly mentioned but the area and khata Nos. were correct. The mistake
application for amendment stating that the Khasra number of the plot of land was wrongly stated to be 498/149 instead of 150 by inadvertence ... time of submitting the reference petition and, therefore, a wrong Khasra number was mentioned in a hurry as the period prescribed for making the reference
description of the property in the sale deed of the
petitioner was wrongly given and he is the adjoining raiyat of the
property ... Sahu of the same Khata number and plot number.
He submits that the original authority had wrongly dismissed the
application for pre-emption and thereafter
deed of exchange on the ground that plot number in the said
deed is wrongly typed as different plot. Therefore, in this present
case
objection
on 05.04.1991, before respondent Nos.1-4 stating that
alternative plot shall not be allotted in the
6
exclusive name of Dhan Singh. Further ... further when objections through
representations were made to the wrongful application
of allotment, on number of dates.
Based on such averments it was prayed
that the plot numbers as recorded in the record-of-rights of 1923-24 settlement did not correspond to the plot numbers of the current ... unserveyed area and, therefore, there could not have been any plot number as claimed by the plaintiff, and that this has been so held
numbers were mentioned wrongly. It was also claimed
that the pleadings of the plaintiff are vague and indefinite as no area of any
khasra number ... claimed that kharsa numbers of
the land in village Lakhnaur were also mentioned wrongly. Ownership of
Hazara Singh to plot
have reached to the wrong
conclusion. The learned counsel has pointed out that in the
aforesaid exhibits only the plot number has been mentioned
