application.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that by
mistake, wrong plot number with wrong area has been mentioned
in the plaint. Subsequently ... application was filed for
correction of the correct plot number and area but the Court below
wrongly held that it is not maintainable and refused
sale deed came to know that C.S. Plot number was wrongly
mentioned as 21 in the sale deed in place of C.S. plot ... necessary rather it is a simple suit for rectification of
plot number, which is wrongly mentioned in the sale deed and if the
intervenor
When the Court below
has found that plot number is wrongly typed, in my opinion, on
this factual aspect only, the impugned order cannot
suit land
appertaining to Hal Plot Nos.3252 and 3265 of Hal Khata No.673
corresponds to Sabik Plot No.2089 of Sabik Khata ... delivered possession of the same. But then, the plot number was
wrongly described in the sale deed. It is further stated that his
natural parents
counsel for the petitioner submitted that in
the plaint the plot number has wrongly been typed which could be
detected at the time of argument
Kant for the petitioners
submitted that by mistake the survey plot number is wrongly
mentioned in the plaint but the learned court below refused ... which was filed by the
plaintiffs-petitioners for mentioning the correct number of plot.
Issue notice to respondent nos.1 to 4 only in admission
filed for amendment of the plaint seeking
correction of plots number, khata number and area on the basis of
Patna High Court C.Misc ... nothing
mentioned like khata number, plot number and area. The learned
counsel further submitted that the learned Court below also
wrongly held that the amendment
been wrongly typed in the agreement and the
plaint in the schedule. In fact the khata number is 518, therefore, the
Khata number be corrected ... land. The boundary is same
and correct. Plot Number is correct. Only Khata number has been
wrongly typed as 558 in place
consideration the said application
and due to that the plot numbers came to be wrongly
mentioned in the award. The defendants did not file ... praying for
rectification of the typographical error in the
numbering of the plots mentioned in the award. Learned
Appellate Tribunal directed the petitioners to make
sale deed for a piece of land, but inserted wrong revision survey
plot number.
Shri N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel for the
petitioner submits
