aggravated
penetrative sexual assault" punishable under Section 6 POCSO (Ref:
Nawabuddin Vs. State of Uttarakhand1). It is also trite that the information
given ... reliable (Ref: State of Punjab Vs. Gurmit Singh5 ;
Ganesan Vs. State6 ).
26. Further, it is worthwhile to mention that Section 29 POCSO creates a
presumption
Through : Ms. Vagisha Kochar, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through : Mr. Neelam Sharma, APP for State.
Complainant/Prosecutrix in-person
along ... preponderance of probability."
(emphasis supplied)
d. In Joy V.S. vs. State of Kerala13 , the Kerala High Court has
observed as under
Vs. State of Andhra
Pradesh and 2013( 56) PTC 282 (Del) State Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs.
Naresh Kumar Garg it is stated that ... Inderjeet Nagpal Vs. Directorate of
Revenue Intelligence (DRI ), and 2006 (91) DRJ 384 Pradeep Mehta Vs.
State and Anr. it is stated that the offence
matrimonial disputes between the victims' parents. In Joy V.S. vs.
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor 2, bail was granted ... Singh vs. State
(Delhi Administration )5 and Mahipal vs. Rajesh Kumar6 .
21. In Dharmander Singh7, the Court considered the particular
provisions of the POCSO
Akhilesh Arya vs State on 23 January, 2023
Author: Mukta Gupta
Bench: Mukta Gupta
2023/DHC/000516
$~R-1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Anshika Sethi, Advocates.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
Represented by: Mr. Prithu Garg, APP for
the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Amit Kala,
Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh, Advs.
versus
STATE ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sabharwal, APP for State,
SI Rohit, PS Hazarat Nizamuddin
CORAM ... 2014, P.S. Hazarat Nizamuddin u/s 6 POCSO Act, case titled „State
Vs. Mohd. Azizul‟ wherein the Applicant has been found guilty under
Section
vs. State (NCT of Delhi ), 2015 SCC OnLine Del 6958
(ii) Deepu vs. State, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 155
( iii) Mossa Koya KP vs. State ... vs. State (NCT of Delhi ), a coordinate bench of
this court, considered the fact that the appellant was sentenced under Section 8
of POCSO
Section 6 POCSO Act and the charge sheet.
18. In the case of " Imran vs. State of Delhi through Commissioner of Delhi
Police ... this basis that
POCSO had been applied to the facts of that case. The object of the
POCSO Act states that the Act is aimed
Varman vs. State , 2016 SCC Online MAD
5681,
(ii) State vs. Rahul, ILR (2013) III DELHI 1861,
( iii) Sant Shri Asharamji Bapu vs. State ... Tahsildar Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1959 Law Suit
(SC) 91 and
(vi) Jaswant Singh vs. State of Haryana
under:-
'State Vs.Sohan Lal
FIR No.50/2016
PS: Palam Village
U/s 4 r/w 18 POCSO Act
03.03.2016
Present: Sh.Shiv ... Kumar, Ld.Addl. PP for State.
Sh.Gaurav Sahdev, Ld.Counsel for the applicant.
Bail Appln.1252/2017 Page 3 of 12
W/SI Sunita
