vs. The State of
Karnataka6 and Radheyshyam & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan7 .
30. In Jayaram Vithoba vs. State of Bombay8 , the
Supreme Court held ... Supreme Court in Dinesh Kumar
vs. State of Haryana13 .
66. In Anees vs. State Government of NCT14 , the Supreme
Court held that the Judge
POCSO Act . If
13
Crl. A. No. 31 of 2018
Mikal Bhujel @ Rubeen vs. State of Sikkim
those act has been committed ... Section 7 of the POCSO Act.
15
Crl. A. No. 31 of 2018
Mikal Bhujel @ Rubeen vs. State of Sikkim
24. In the above discussion
Late Keshav Chettri
Resident of 8th Mile Budhang,
West Sikkim. .... Appellant
versus
State of Sikkim
.... Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code ... Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) Act and Section 354 of the
2
Crl. A. No. 05 of 2017
Damber Singh Chettri vs. State of Sikkim
Indian
Appellant on Biradmal Singhvi vs. Anand Purohit1, Alamelu vs. State2
and Murugan alias Settu vs. State of Tamil Nadu3 . A peripheral
argument emerged that ... Lakhi Ram Takbi vs. State of Sikkim
the facts and circumstances stated the impugned judgment
and order on sentence deserves to be set aside
Narain and Others vs. State of Punjab4 , Panchhi and Others vs. State of
5
U.P. and Rajoo and Others vs. State ... this
Court in Robin Gurung vs. State of Sikkim7 . Reliance was also placed
in State of Rajasthan vs. Chandgi Ram and Others8 .
4. The rival
Resident of Payung Busty,
Melli,
South Sikkim.
[Presently at State Central Prison, Rongyek.]
VERSUS
RESPONDENT: State of Sikkim
Application under Section ... Budha Singh Tamang vs. State of Sikkim
Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter 'POCSO'), South Sikkim at Namchi
dated 31.08.2015, in Sessions Trial (POCSO) Case
Bahadur Subba vs. State of Sikkim
Gyalshing , in Sessions Trial (POCSO) Case No.09 of 2014, both dated
25-05-2015, in which the Appellant ... Bahadur Subba vs. State of Sikkim
completion of investigation, under Sections 376 / 506 of the IPC read
with Section 4 of the POCSO Act against
Pariyar alias Darjee vs. State of Sikkim 6
victim was a child, as defined under Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act.
For this purpose ... alias Darjee vs. State of Sikkim
another1, Lall Bahadur Kami vs. The State of Sikkim2 , Mangala
Mishra @ Dawa Tamang @ Jack vs. State of Sikkim3
POCSO Act, 2012 ),
South Sikkim, at Namchi, vide Judgment dated 30-06-2022, in
ST(POCSO) Case No.27 of 2020 (State of Sikkim vs ... Reliance was also placed on State of Sikkim vs.
10
Jigmee Bhutia and Shri Sajal Rai alias Adrian vs. State of Sikkim11 .
That, no evidence
State-Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
1(i). The Appellant, in ST (POCSO) case No. 10 of 2015,
State of Sikkim vs. Binod Tamang ... Binod Tamang vs. State of Sikkim
Learned Special Judge (POCSO) Act, East Sikkim at Gangtok on or
before 13-06-2022, for the above stated
