notice was served on
the appellants / opposite parties by process server and not by registered
post. He also pointed out that the notice was actually ... notice was actually issued on 29.1.2013 which was served by
process server on the appellants / opposite parties on 6.2.2013. Before
- 3-
completion of 30 days
served upon the appellant by any registered post,
merely driver of the complainant went along with process server to the
shop and then made endorsement
through Regd.Post on 24.2.1999, but
the same was received back undelivered on 11.3.1999. It was again sent to him
through Process Server
order impugned sent at the address of
the applicants/ appellants, through Process Server was received back, with the
report that no Institute existed ... that Opposite Party No.1, was duly served, on 01.08.2012, through Process
Server, in the complaint. It was further stated that Opposite Party
without
assistance of process server.
18. As per law notice of dasti summon should be
served through process server of District Forum only ... notice may be made
by delivering means delivering of notice through process
server of learned District Forum and does not mean delivery
8
Harjeet Singh
address. Once he does this and the
letter is delivered to the Post Office, he has no control over it. It is then presumed ... absence.
His responsibilities cannot, therefore, be equated to those of a process
server entrusted with the responsibilities of serving the summons of a Court under
year ending 31.03.2010 alongwith interest @18% per annum,
was filed through post.
3. Notice was sent to Opposite Party
No.1, by the District Forum ... District Forum, at the residence of the applicant/appellant through
Process Server, on 29.02.2012. It was stated that the applicant/appellant,
appended a note
falls due only during December 2012 subject to completion of the installation process. The Opponent Company encashed the Cheque ... Opponent Company immediately on the grounds that, the said cheque was post dated. Complainant made payment of the said amount also by way of RTGS
petitioner present. Notice sent to the O.P. No.2 by registered post. It is presumed that it is served but no step taken ... were issued upon the opposite parties. From the report of the process server as well as the order dated 29.04.2016, it appears that the wife
complainant
carefully.
10. Opposite parties filed affidavit of Pawan Kumar
Gupta Manager posted in Somany Ceramics Limited. There is
4
M/s. Somany Ceramics ... advocate appearing on
behalf of appellant that as per report of process server
submitted before learned District Forum Jagdish Chand Puri
was expired
