Mohit (arrest witness)
PW4 :- Insp. Manish Kumar (IInd IO and
process server)
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
Ex. PW1/A :- Statement of complainant ... Digitally
signed by
process server in the present case who stated on oath that on UR
ANKUR
PANGHAL
20.03.2013 he was posted at PS Seema
process server IO SI
Vikas Sahu was recorded by learned M.M on 21.02.2015 which
reads as under:-
"On 13.01.2015, I was posted ... point A."
18.Bare perusal of the abovesaid statement of process server, it is
apparent that he was entrusted the process
examined as nil, opportunity given.
5. HC Kanwar Pal the concerned process server has been examined as
PW2 who deposed that he had received process ... court with the
report Ex. PW1/A. PW2 is the process server himself, who deposed that he had
received the process
days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and
statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
JUDGMENT
Name of the complainant : HC Om Prakash,
Belt No. 3534/SE,
Posted at PS Kalkaji
New Delhi.
Date of Commission of offence : 25.01.2018
Name ... days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance
days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and
statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
JUDGMENT
Name of the complainant : HC Om Prakash,
Belt No. 3534/SE,
Posted at PS Kalkaji
New Delhi.
Date of Commission of offence : 25.01.2018
Name ... days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance
JUDGMENT
Name of the complainant : HC Rakesh Kumar,
Belt No. 3439/SE,
Posted at PS Kalkaji
Date of Commission of offence : 25.01.2018
Name ... days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance
days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the
concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear
before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and
statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
State vs . Ved Prakash on 23 April, 2022
_________________________________________________________________________
IN THE COURT OF SH. MAYANK GOEL
