Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 (1.47 seconds)

State vs . on 28 November, 2022

Mohit (arrest witness) PW4 :- Insp. Manish Kumar (IInd IO and process server) DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Ex. PW1/A :- Statement of complainant ... Digitally signed by process server in the present case who stated on oath that on UR ANKUR PANGHAL 20.03.2013 he was posted at PS Seema
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sohan @ Sonu on 28 April, 2022

examined as nil, opportunity given. 5. HC Kanwar Pal the concerned process server has been examined as PW2 who deposed that he had received process ... court with the report Ex. PW1/A. PW2 is the process server himself, who deposed that he had received the process
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mirza Naee Baig on 11 May, 2022

JUDGMENT Name of the complainant : HC Rakesh Kumar, Belt No. 3439/SE, Posted at PS Kalkaji Date of Commission of offence : 25.01.2018 Name ... days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear before the Court despite issuance
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mirza Naee Baig on 11 May, 2022

days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mirza Naee Baig on 11 May, 2022

days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mirza Naee Baig on 11 May, 2022

JUDGMENT Name of the complainant : HC Om Prakash, Belt No. 3534/SE, Posted at PS Kalkaji New Delhi. Date of Commission of offence : 25.01.2018 Name ... days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear before the Court despite issuance
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mirza Naee Baig on 11 May, 2022

days. The said proclamation was duly executed by the concerned process server on 13.06.2017. However, accused had failed to appear before the Court despite issuance ... documents i.e. factum of registration of FIR and statement of process server u/s 294 Cr.PC Ex. P1 and P2 respectively. Therefore
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next